Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julia Stamatova vs Andrina Peer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stamatova vs Peer analysis and find out who is favored!
Julia Stamatova vs Andrina Peer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stamatova 1 - 0 Peer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stamatova has won 39.92% of points on their second serve, while Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stamatova, in recent form, has won 52.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.27% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stamatova has saved 51.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stamatova has won 49.21% of matches played (W/L 31/ 32), with Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stamatova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 139/ 114), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Peer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 26/ 41), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 26% (W/L 9/ 26).
- Player level: In the last year, Stamatova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Peer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stamatova winning 1 times and Peer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Stamatova winning 2 and Peer winning 0. The last match between Stamatova and Peer was at the Ortisei, 17-12-2018, First, I.hard with Julia Stamatova getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stamatova and Peer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Stamatova winning 0 times and Peer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stamatova winning 0, and Peer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stamatova has played against opponents with an average rank of 110.98 while Peer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stamatova has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stamatova has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
745
Rank
451
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
53% (464-411)
Career Total W/L
34% (38-75)
36% (8-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Julia Stamatova vs Andrina Peer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Stamatova VS Peer
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Julia Stamatova | Andrina Peer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (28/44) | 47% (20/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (21/28) | 45% (9/20) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (7/16) | 30% (7/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (27/43) | 36% (16/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Julia Stamatova
Player
Andrina Peer
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julia Stamatova | Andrina Peer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (8/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (22/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (218/266) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 35% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 13 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 104 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 34.86 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (859/1354) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (488/859) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (198/494) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (68/155) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (606/1363) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Julia Stamatova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Julia Stamatova
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
58
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 1-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
Player
Julia Stamatova
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
112)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
54 of
112)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Petra Konjikusic
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
43%
(
42 of
97)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Doga Turkmen
Player
Julia Stamatova
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
6-0 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rinon Okuwaki
Player
Julia Stamatova
79%
(
73 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Defne Cirpanli
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Julia Stamatova
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrina Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Andrina Peer
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrina Peer
Player
Rubina Marta De Ponti
50%
(
51 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
1
Aces
2
25
Double Faults
10
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
37%
(
19 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
50%
(
51 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrina Peer
Player
Viktoria Surova
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Westby
Player
Andrina Peer
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
43%
(
34 of
79)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
18
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
48 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrina Peer
Player
Shannon Cox
41%
(
34 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
2
Aces
0
17
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
33%
(
16 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
55%
(
46 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
55 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katharina Hering
Player
Andrina Peer
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
41%
(
16 of
39)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
12
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrina Peer
Player
Klaudia Wira
46%
(
36 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
2
Aces
0
18
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shannon Cox
Player
Andrina Peer
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
43%
(
34 of
79)
0
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
29
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
22%
(
6 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
11 of
45)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
56%
(
37 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
48 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Andrina Peer
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrina Peer
Player
Lea Jurkovic
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stamatova Vs Peer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Stamatova are available here and Peer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
